Out of fourteen issues regarding cervical cancers testing, women whoever score was in fact ? 10 was randomly categorized given that that have ‘a great knowledge’ normally getbride.org tryk pГҐ stedet was in fact thought to be with “negative studies”. To own experience in HPV, feminine whoever answer is ‘never been aware of HPV’ was indeed omitted regarding the investigation out of HPV degree.
Off 5 issues, feminine whose get had been ? 3 have been considered as with ‘a great experience with HPV’ if not while the ‘not good knowledge’. Off 19 questions, women whoever get was indeed ? thirteen was indeed categorized just like the which have ‘a beneficial total knowledge’ usually given that ‘unhealthy complete knowledge’.
All study have been built-up during the an electronic digital databases and you will analyzed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to research market investigation and you will have been described because wide variety that have percentage, indicate that have simple departure otherwise average which have assortment. The latest relationship between per variable and you can training score were reviewed using simple linear regression. Exploratory model was made inside multivariable investigation also all variables potentially associated with the data score. The latest thought level of analytical advantages try an excellent p-worth of 0.05 or less.
Regarding five-hundred women that fulfilled addition criteria and you will was greeting toward research, one ong 499 ladies who responded to new questionnaire in the education of cervical cancer tumors and you may screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (area II), a few did not bring information that is personal. Therefore market analysis had been found in simply 497 feminine (Desk step 1). The newest mean ages of 497 members try decades (SD ± ). Over fifty percent of your own professionals was indeed aged Table step 1. Socio-monetary characteristic (N = 497).
The fresh signs having colposcopy were abnormal cervical cytology with exposure off HR-HPV (155; 29.2%), unpredictable cytology which have bad or not familiar from Hours-Horsepower (274; 55.1%), visibility from only Hours-HPV (65; thirteen.1%), or merely reputation for CIN (3; 0.6%) (Table dos).
Considering for each and every matter in the cervical disease assessment (Desk step 3), 95.4% off 499 women misunderstood that most feminine will likely be screened for cervical cancer tumors (Q step 1). Approximately 55% to 70% realized when you should begin and you will frequency of evaluation (Q 2–4). not, only 17.4% and you will 36.3%have been conscious that the fresh new examination was not needed after that–just after hysterectomy getting low-cervical malignant tumors (Q 5) otherwise immediately after 65 decades with reputation of consecutively regular previous evaluation (Q six).
Toward types of assessment (Q 7–14), 79% away from players were aware there are of several evaluating tips (Q 7). But not, just eight.2% had knowledge one cervical screening might possibly be complete at that time from pelvic examination (Q 8). The players was basically always cervical cytologic analysis (Q 10; 93.8%), HPV assessment (Q eleven; 89.2%), co-analysis (Q a dozen; ninety-five.4%) although not having visual examination immediately after acetic acidic (VIA) that has been known within 31.7% (Q 9). Furthermore, 57.7% and you will 65.3% of players had misconception one cervical cancer tumors screening might possibly be complete because of the imaging (Q thirteen) and you can blood sample having tumor indicators (Q 14), respectively.
To own experience with HPV, 110 members (20.0%) got never observed HPV. Among the kept 389 members, bulk (92.5%) understood one HPV disease try preventable and you can 85.1% was conscious that it is preventable by vaccination. Even if bulk (ninety.5%) realized you to cervical cancer tumors is due to oncogenic HPV, just about half realized that it could be avoided by steering clear of sexual passion or venereal wart is due to low-oncogenic HPV.
I assessed expertise in the participants of the get (Table 4). The suggest an incredible number of members to own experience with cervical cancers evaluation (N = 499) as well as HPV (N = 389) was ± 2.37 (from 14 inquiries) and you can step 3.53 ± step 1.11 (of 5 issues), respectively. Of the categorization, 26.9% and you will 20.1% had a good experience in cervical malignant tumors testing and you may HPV correspondingly. This new mean sum score of knowledge throughout the cervical cancer tumors tests and you can HPV was basically ± dos.87 (regarding 19 concerns), with just twenty five.2% got an effective complete studies.